KUNGFU AND SILAT

A report that Hong Kong superstar Jackie Chan wanted to do serious role

like The Karate Kid and apparently it has led to readers arguing/debating
which is better than the other, Kungfu or Silat?
Why do they argue and if those readers are Malaysians, I presume they are,
then Malaysians are an argumentative lot, we just love to argue, don't we?
Becoz in the first place, The DAILY CHILLI didn't mention anything about Silat
or comparing Silat with Kungfu, but some readers take it up to argue for
sake of argument. Freedom of speech or expression? Yes?
Anyway, since I'm here with this topic, I might as well join in the fun and talk
about Silat and Kungfu. LOL

Kungfu no matter which way or how you look at it, or which direction you are
looking at, vertically, horizontally or diagonally, the art of Kungfu is definitely
more challenging and interesting than Silat.

Kungfu actions whether in real life or in movies are more popular, more deadly
more lethal where practically you can find


the art of Kungfu everywhere in every continent on earth and enjoy by many.


Whereas Silat I find kinda boring stuff and if you were to ask some foreigners
about Silat, huh, they will reply sarcastically' Silat? What's that?


The Silat is slow in motion that make it so boring to watch or enjoy and the
silat fighter would be floored in split seconds by the Kungfu fighter and yet
doesn't know what hit him.
So Silat or Kungfu ah?